politics

The Key To Pee Wee Herman’s Playhouse


Some thoughts on the Michael Vick, “Key To The City” fiasco.   We now know that it was not a “real” key to the city.  It was a “Mack-Daddy” key to the city to be used by Dallas City Council members including Dwaine Caraway who is the Mayor Pro Tem to suck up to any celebrity that they deem beneficial to their personal agenda.

This is not the first time the pseudo honorary keys have been given out on such basis.  Real “keys to the city” have protocol to be followed.  They are generally given out by the Mayor and reserved for visiting international dignitaries.

If Mayor Pro Tem Dwaine Caraway wants to get on his suck up soap box for Michael Vick and bestow whatever compliments he deems appropriate at a private event that is his right.  Frankly, when you compartmentalize it,  Vick does deserve compliments for some of the work he has done with children and such since he got out of prison just as he deserves criticism and disdain for what he did to get there.  I won’t let my disdain for what he did, cloud that fact.  I also do not begrudge Caraway the right to talk about and congratulate Vick for those endeavors at private events. It’s a free country.  Does that entitled Carraway to bestow such a general honor that speaks for the City Of Dallas?   Not a chance in hell.  When Caraway handed Michael that key, he spoke for the city.  He spoke for me.  He spoke for you if you live in Dallas.  He did not have my support.  More important, he  did not have the support of the city.   Mayor Tom Leppert  made it perfectly clear that he did not have such support.   He did not have the support of City Council either.  They also represent the city.  One might say,

“I am a constituent and I supported the awarding of the key.

That’s great.  You are right.  You are however in the very minute minority.  How do I know?  I don’t for sure.  No poll taken.  I feel strong enough about it however to state that anyone who thinks any more than a small percentage of voters in the city of Dallas supported that move is on crack.  I suspect that Caraway will find that out the hard way when he is either replaced as Mayor Pro-Tem due to the majority outrage or at election time.

In further Key news, it is my understanding that Pee Wee Herman is up for the next for the next Dallas honor for all his wonderful work with children.  If you have children of your own,  make sure to change your locks today.  Who knows what door that key will open.

Posted in politicsComments (0)

The Angry Internet


As we all mourn the loss of life in the Arizona shooting and hope for the speedy recovery of those injured, I can not help but wonder what extent the rise of internet and media hate speech played at a minimum, a tinderbox role in the event.  One only has to use Google and stare in wonder at the breadth of the angry net to understand how this could happen and mind boggle at the fact that it has not happened more often.

Should society become less tolerant of viral hatred and online rants that even tangentially target individuals or classes even though the 1st Amendment protects such speech?  Anger, threats and whacked out nut jobs abound in an boundaryless arena that often seems to value protection of rhetoric over the safety of the  individual.  The downside and upside of a free and democratic society. It however, seems clear that while the 1st Amendment still provides the same guidelines set out in cases like Brandenburg v. Ohio, society as a whole is becoming less tolerant of such internet vitriol.  Should the 1st Amendment also morph to take more notice of the threat and offer less protection to violent rants and media incitement?  It appears that it is happening even without the blessing of SCOTUS.

As a society we are becoming less tolerant of angry people on the internet, especially when those angry people incite other angry  people to take action even when those people are unknown.   It used to take more than theoretical action and nebulous calls to action.  There had to be real an imminent threat.  That is no longer the case.  Outside of courtrooms and far away from 1st Amendment legal briefs, a post 9-11 and  Nidal Malik Hasan society is becoming more thin skinned to veiled written threats that may have one time never made it to a jury but now are taken seriously and result in convictions even though there is no real imminent threat to the intended recipient or even to a general class of individuals.  Prosecutors are getting convictions on web rants and internet threats in which ranters are left to wonder what went wrong while they do prison time and their appeal winds its way through the court thinking  they had followed the “can’t touch me” 1st Amendment blueprint.  As society becomes more fearful and tired of such internet vitriol the 1st Amendment becomes less of a Kryptonite shield and such arguments to a jury are more likely to fall of deaf ears.  Times are changing.  The 1st Amendment and the societal concept of “free speech” is changing with them.

Posted in Law and Order, politicsComments (2)

Hitler’s Jewish Soldiers


Would it surprise anyone to learn that there were upwards of 150, 000 soldiers of partial Jewish descent serving in the German army during World War II?  I had no idea until I attended a lecture by Bryan Mark Rigg discussing his book entitled Hitler’s Jewish Soldiers.  What is even more startling is that Adolf Hitler was aware of this and for a while allowed them to serve.  In most cases these soldiers had no knowledge of the Holocaust killing machine.  From their point of view they were simple German patriots fighting for their country. Many did not even consider themselves Jewish. Some were unaware of their “Jewish blood”.  According to his book, at least 20 soldiers of “Jewish blood” were awarded The Knights Cross.  Included in the ranks were two field marshals and fifteen generals. The most prominently known of these commanders of Jewish descent was General Erhard Milch who had one Jewish parent.  He was deputy to Herman Goring, the head of the Luftwaffe(German Air Force).

When I look back at my own Jewish Immigrant background, the “specter” of Jews fighting for the Nazis in the traditional sense sickens stomach. My ancestry is much like other Jewish immigrants. Both sides of my family immigrated to the Unites States from Czarist Russia in the early 1900′s. They came to escape the brutal exterminating pogroms of the Russian authorities much like the extermination of Jews by the Nazis. Czarist officials not only promoted pogroms to blame Jews for government failures and economic depressions but also to isolate jews and keep them fearful. They forced the “Protocols Of The Elders Of Zion,” a documents used the to justify persecuting Jews ans stil in circulation now in Middle Eastern Countries to “prove” that Jews controlled World Finance. Moreover, the Czars conscripted Jewish youth as young as 12 to serve 25 years in the army. Some Russian Jews immigrated to Poland only to be ultimately persecuted by both the Hitler regime and their very own. German born Jews treated Eastern Jews as inferior calling them “Ghetto Jews”. Jews of this background constituted the majority of the Jews massacred pursuant to “The Final Solution“.

The common public notion is that no one of Jewish descent would have ever been allowed to serve in the Nazi regime and, if discovered, would be immediately deported to a forced labor or extermination/concentration camp. This was not the case. The Nazi racial classification or “Nuremberg Lawswere complex and bizarre as to who was classified as a “Jew”. (see Nazi classification chart) This classification dispute is responsible for some controversy. Some scholars have complained that the title of Rigg’s book is sensational and misleading because it implies that these Nazi soldiers were Jewish when, in fact, many of them would not be classified as Jews under Jewish law (Young men were considered Jewish if their mothers were Jewish.). Many of the soldiers interviewed did not consider themselves Jewish at all and had been baptized into a Christian tradition. I view this as a simplistic criticism since the overall issue of how Hitler bent and twisted the racial laws of his regime to serve his own bizarre purposes in the face of the Nuremberg laws is a fascinating idea that Riggs explains from a unique perspective. Riggs demonstrates the willingness of the Nazis to bend their own laws of racial classification and Jewish persecution and documents Hitler’s extensive , obsessive involvement in deciding which “Jews” received a pass ,which would be discharged, and which would ultimately be deported. Riggs also explores the historical, religious and cultural individual personal conflicts of “The Jewish Identity”.

While most of Jewish descent were ordinary Wehrmacht soldiers, some rose to very high ranking positions of authority in the Nazi Regime. Some either directly or indirectly participated in the Jewish killing machine. Germans of Jewish descent were fighting for a country whose official policy was that they were regarded as second-class citizens and, in most cases, not even human. Germans of Jewish descent were fighting for a country that was deporting their relatives to concentrations camps for eventual extermination. Germans of Jewish descent were fighting for a country who, some say, planned to ultimately exterminate them also when Germany won the war.  How could these “Jews” fight for a country that planned their extinction?  Why did Hitler allow this to take place?  We know it is not due to the common misconception that Hitler was part Jewish.  Scholars universally agree that there is no evidence of this.  Rigg’s thesis certainly goes against everything I believed about my identity as a Jew and what it means to be Jewish.  Does having “Jewish blood” in itself make you Jewish?  While the simple answer seems to be no, it was quite complicated in Nazi Germany.

A fascinating aspect of the lecture and the book is the method by which the Nazis determined who was Jewish and who was not. For racial and military purposes, the Nazi Party classified Jewish people as full Jews, half Jews, and quarter Jews. Each classification was treated differently with regards to whether they could serve in the German military and what rights, if any, they had under German law. As previously mentioned, according to Jewish law, a person is determined to be a Jew if the person’s mother is Jewish.

I would have been a full Jew under Nazi laws. All four of my grandparents on both sides were Jewish. I am also of Russian descent. Not only would I have been prohibited from serving in the German military, I would have in all likelihood been on the first train out to to Auschwitz or some other extermination camp. Jews of Eastern descent or “Ghetto Jews” were also looked down upon and discriminated against by German born Jews as well as the Germans. It was a double whammy. (it was an upper vs lower class type discrimination as compared to the totalitarian discrimination of the Nazis)

Many of those of partial Jewish descent while Jewish by both Jewish law and Nazi racial classification had become so assimilated into the German-Christian society through mixed marriages that they did not consider themselves Jewish. Some were practicing Christians. This was only changed through Hitler’s racial classification system and the Nuremberg Laws which officially made the majority of people of full and partial Jewish descent second-class citizens called “Mischling“, meaning they came from a mixed marriage and had partial Jewish ancestry. Germans of partial Jewish descent who had practiced Christianity all of their lives, were suddenly classified as a “Mischling,” Jews under Hitler’s racial classification laws. They were suddenly stripped of most rights under German law.

Interestingly, the situation was not just a German/Jewish phenomenon. In 1941, Finland joined the war as a “co-belligerent” of Germany. (Finland refused to call itself an ally.) There were 250-300 Finnish-Jews fighting alongside Germany on the eastern front against Russia, and some of the Finnish-Jews were even awarded German battle decorations. Soldiers with Jewish heritage also fought along side the Nazis when Romania was aligned against the Soviet Union as well as for Italy.

There was a huge ideology gap between what occurred in Finland and Nazi Germany. Finland was not under Nazi rule. Finland, from its perspective, was fighting for its independence from Russia rather than to support any anti-Semitic ideology or German persecution. Finland as a nation refused to endorse the Nazi anti-Semitic policies and refused to deport, persecute or discriminate against its Jewish population. It is quite the paradox that despite this policy their fighting alongside Germany certainly helped Germany achieve military goals and indirectly aided in the Jewish persecutions. The Finnish-Jewish soldiers were not blind to what was going on. It caused quite a bit of internal conflict and tension with the German soldiers. This was also not a racial classification issue. Finland did not discriminate against or classify their Jews. In this situation, full, practicing Jews were fighting alongside the Nazis against the Allies, fighting predominately at Leningrad.

The German racial classification system for Jews and the resulting disparate treatment with regards to military service in the Nazi army highlights some of the fundamental issues of Jewish Identify that exist even today. What does it mean to be Jewish? What qualities and beliefs make someone Jewish? If your mother is Jewish you are certainly a Jews by definition of Jewish Law but that may not be how you may look at yourself if you were not raised in the Jewish tradition. Are we as Jews defined by our culture, our religious practices or how other view us? As an example, several years ago I got into a heated argument when a person who was close to me told me in her opinion I was not Jewish because I did not adhere to Jewish religious practices. I was infuriated. It was and is my belief that my bond to Judaism is through culture, common history and suffering. The bond that all Jews share. That is what defines me as a Jew. She could not grasp this concept. This was the dilemma faced by many of the Mischling in Nazi Germany. This is a historical and religious conflict faced by Jews today as mixed marriages have become much more common and accepted in the United States. Jews argue among themselves over this issue. It is a conflict that transcends time.

Posted in Book Excerpts, politicsComments (0)

So You Know A Couple Jews-Do You Want A Medal?


Apparently there are some politicians who feel Jews should be persona non grata in the Texas House Of Representatives.

State Republican Executive Committee, official John Cook is one of those who believe Jews do not possess the correct “values” to represent the Lone Star State wanting to oust incumbent Speaker Joe Straus, who is Jewish.

Cook is spearheading the return of “Christian values” to the legislature.  Cook wrote in an email:

We elected a house with Christian, conservative values. We now want a true Christian, conservative running it,”

We could go into heated debate over Christian values, Jewish values and separation of church and state. Who cares. I thought the desired qualities of a politician were honesty, integrity and the ability to get things done using those qualities.  Is Cook saying that Jews do not possess those attributes?  In my mind, the most compelling part of Cook’s interview was the following statement:

“I have friends who are Jewish.  I have no racial bigotry.”

There you have it.  The emperor has no clothes.   That type of statement in that context is used  unwaveringly by bigots/anti-Semites to deflect scrutiny of the fact that they simply don’t like Jews, Blacks, Hispanics, Muslims or other minorities.  It is used to defend antisemitic/bigoted viewpoints which always have no logic or reason behind them.  It goes something like this:

There is no logic or factual basis to what I just said but hey, I know a couple Jews so its all good”

That statement in the context used told me all I need to know about the true motives Joe Cook. I wonder what his Jewish “friend” thinks of him now.

Posted in politicsComments (2)

Follow Me



The Revolution Rant Radio Show

Newsletter

Sign up for The Revolution Rant! Stay up to date on the great guests and provocative topics on my weekly web-cast!
Viva la Revolucion!


powered by MailChimp!

Brian Cuban on Facebook

Related Sites