<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Don&#8217;t Be Hurt When That Associated Press Hottie De-Friends You</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.briancuban.com/dont-be-hurt-when-that-associated-press-hottie-de-friends-you/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.briancuban.com/dont-be-hurt-when-that-associated-press-hottie-de-friends-you/</link>
	<description>Brian Cuban's version of TRUTH, JUSTICE  and the UN-AMERICAN WAY</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 22:43:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ariela</title>
		<link>http://www.briancuban.com/dont-be-hurt-when-that-associated-press-hottie-de-friends-you/comment-page-1/#comment-6733</link>
		<dc:creator>Ariela</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 02:58:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.briancuban.com/?p=8328#comment-6733</guid>
		<description>All the AP reporters need to do is to really heighten the privacy settings for their Facebook and Twitter profiles, so that they&#039;re even unsearchable by anyone. From their if the AP feels the need to unconventionally find their profile, I do believe that may be considered invasion of privacy. If their feed is only open to friends and family and noone else can find them, including their superiors, they should be able to speak their mind freely without getting into trouble.   
 
On a similar note, is it legal for the Associated Press to restrict their reporters&#039; freedom of speech so much? I can understand that they may ask them not to comment on issues related directly to the company in a public setting. Yet, in a more private setting where they may comment on the world news, is it realistic that an employer can expect from and ask of an employee to not be themselves and express their interests and opinions? </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All the AP reporters need to do is to really heighten the privacy settings for their Facebook and Twitter profiles, so that they&#039;re even unsearchable by anyone. From their if the AP feels the need to unconventionally find their profile, I do believe that may be considered invasion of privacy. If their feed is only open to friends and family and noone else can find them, including their superiors, they should be able to speak their mind freely without getting into trouble.   </p>
<p>On a similar note, is it legal for the Associated Press to restrict their reporters&#039; freedom of speech so much? I can understand that they may ask them not to comment on issues related directly to the company in a public setting. Yet, in a more private setting where they may comment on the world news, is it realistic that an employer can expect from and ask of an employee to not be themselves and express their interests and opinions?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

