Comments on: Jeffrey Norris Emails To Mark Cuban

By: DanaX

DanaX — Sat, 18 Jul 2009 18:53:51 +0000

Thanks for making those emails public. It really bothers me to see people like Norris equate the content of a film like Loose Change with Nazism, racism etc. This is a tactic that has become common for those who defend the official conspiracy theory and is used to place those who question it in a defensive posture. Since when are conspiracy theories unacceptable? Prosecuting attornies offer nothing but conspiracy theories to juries, then once evidence is examined and a verdict is reached, the conspiracy theories become known as truth. Why is examination of the evidence not allowed when it comes to 911? Never is a calm debate about the points that the film makes undertaken. A lawyer, of all people, should be able to analyze data and evidence and come to a rational conclusion as would a scientist.

So to go from this weak attack on Mark's freedom to distribute a dissenting film by Norris to a weak SEC case with him as the attacker once again would appear to be more than a strong coincidence.

By: bcuban

bcuban — Tue, 02 Dec 2008 07:01:46 +0000

I may not agree Tammy but i respect them all, even yours,

By: Tammy

Tammy — Tue, 02 Dec 2008 06:59:08 +0000

Okay, that's it the only thing that has been done here is that you wont let people express how they feal about this article. Mr. Norris has done nothing wrong. There was no evidence of fowl mouthing, he has been nothing but polite. Yes i will admit it was kinda stupid for him to email Mark because you are evil. You have no respect for people views and opinions.

By: Tammy

Tammy — Tue, 02 Dec 2008 06:50:43 +0000

I understand you may delete my comments, but you may not put this to rest Mr. Norris has done nothing wrong. He has been nothing but polite, there was no evidence of fowl mouthing in Mr. Norris's emails.

By: Tammy

Tammy — Tue, 02 Dec 2008 06:47:16 +0000

I understand Mr. Norris has possibly done something wrong, but if Mr. Cuban is aloud to express his own political views through this movie, then why can't Norris? From what we've seen of the e-mails (only Norris' side, not Cuban's), Norris has never been fowl mouthed towards Cuban. This whole thing has blown way out of proportion.

By: GilbertThousand

GilbertThousand — Wed, 26 Nov 2008 05:56:36 +0000

This is creazy and people believe in given the goverment more power. The fact is clear the goverment has been given a Cart Blanc to act has they please. They employee individuals who meet the stablishment personal agenda. Please people get together and exercise your reason, exercise good investigation skills and make they right decision. Not base in racial, religious, economical discrimination. But please take the power back from those who we entrust to protect us if they show any lack of moral turpitude. Now the goverment has a fight in there hands because MC is a billionare but what about who are not.

By: Nancy McBeth

Nancy McBeth — Tue, 25 Nov 2008 05:40:13 +0000

When this issue came out in the news about Mark's sale of stock in 1999 (for crying out loud), I really was smacked in the head with disbelief. Now, at the end of the miserable Bush Administration term(s), this moron (Jeff Norris) is going after Mark in what appears to be payback for disagreement with him (Jeff) and the current presidents administration.

The entirety of this bull smacks completely of domestic terrorism to me – by the government. Just like the last 8 years of hell. Uninformed at that and just because they can!

I am currently printing out all these lovely emails.
By the way, I love BailoutSleuth.com!!

Thanks, Brian, for posting these emails.
And, best wishes to Mark. I'm sorry this is happening to him.

By: butterfly

butterfly — Tue, 25 Nov 2008 01:08:42 +0000

This guy needs to keep his personal life and business life seperate. But it looks like this guy has a I can do whatever i want attitude because I work for the SEC. What else is he wasting taxpayer money on? Doesn't seem that the SEC is getting what it is paying for…..Using company email for personal use at this level – Looks like the SEC needs to take action against there own.. Go Mavs!!!!

By: Be careful what you write… « Dube’s World

Be careful what you write… « Dube’s World — Mon, 24 Nov 2008 17:48:42 +0000

[...] Cuban sent me a full e-mail exchange between his brother, Mark Cuban, and an attorney with the SEC. The e-mail exchange is public and has been all over national news for the last few [...]

By: LewP

LewP — Mon, 24 Nov 2008 12:32:33 +0000

Incredible.
I'm trying to think of the word that means you seek out a person to harrass and try to humiliate in public. It seems pretty childish of Jeff. Aren't there laws against harrassment?

By: Mark B.

Mark B. — Mon, 24 Nov 2008 11:05:31 +0000

This is yet one more example of why the richer and more famous you are, the nicer you should be to everyone. Mark is a good guy who probably will be inconvenienced, but not disrupted by this SEC employee's political agenda. You would think our government would have more important things to worry about – Like maybe going after all the Wall Street CEOs, Investment Bankers and Mortgage brokers that have turned our economy into crap.

By: Ralph

Ralph — Mon, 24 Nov 2008 04:32:12 +0000

The only person who used bad judgment here was Mr. Norris who used his work email account to attack and criticize an individual on matters completely unrelated to the mission of the SEC (i.e., to protect investors).

By: Daryl Zernick

Daryl Zernick — Sun, 23 Nov 2008 04:53:18 +0000

CONTINUED… Let us see, he’s the Treasury Secretary opposed to transparency and a well-known billionaire starts a website that does just what he does not want done. I think he was informed of it somehow, someway, don’t you? I am sure you can conclude where I am going with this. Whether it is Jeff Norris or a wink and a nod to Cox by Paulson, it seems to me that there is an abuse of power here, no matter how small, or in the case of the Commissioner and Secretary, how big. I believe that if you start with where the snowball began, you will find something much more repugnant giving it a push to start it’s downhill trek.

By: Daryl Zernick

Daryl Zernick — Sun, 23 Nov 2008 04:52:16 +0000

I figured that all this started over Transparency. Mark starts BailoutSleuth.com and a month later the SEC digs up something trivial (compared to the raping of Americans investments today) from 4 years ago. SEC Commissioner Chris Cox and Treasury Secretary Hank Paulson have known each other for a long time and are spending more time together now than in the past with all the corruption on Wall Street that has recently taken place. Paulson has made it very clear that he is adverse to any transparency with the billions of dollars he is dolling out. Is it possible that Paulson was aware of the new BailoutSleuth.com website?