Comments on: The Legality Of Social Media Gaming

By: John Sullivan

John Sullivan — Mon, 02 Feb 2009 05:31:03 +0000

Hey
Wanted to stop by the theme looks awesome and glad to see it's do follow,as far as the post I can't understand simple ways in these times I'll pass on caring about rich people loosing their money.
PS I can submit to a whole lot of sites fast now we don't need just any site. I tend to go to ones where
I think the owner/s cool and that's not to many LOL

By: Azi

Azi — Sat, 31 Jan 2009 02:11:08 +0000

this line says it all "As long as there is money to be made the Digg Cease and Desist lawyers will stay busy."

if there is money to be made then people will game the system and will do digging for others for money,…this is true everywhere, some people think SU is the best place but it is being gamed by its own POWER users, who game the system by photoblogging their own blog material and then getting thousands of visitors.

Azi's Recent post…null

By: Don Draper

Don Draper — Sat, 31 Jan 2009 01:44:37 +0000

What if Usocial is using diggers that are in a jurisdiction where Digg's click wrap in unenforceable? There seems to be the assumption that they're getting their diggers from the US. What if they're using Indians?

Don Draper's Recent post…null

By: Brian Cuban

Brian Cuban — Sat, 31 Jan 2009 01:03:26 +0000

Yes I do, my bad….

By: SeaMowse

SeaMowse — Sat, 31 Jan 2009 00:57:30 +0000

September of 2007? Don't you mean 2008?

SeaMowse's Recent post…null

By: bcuban

bcuban — Fri, 30 Jan 2009 22:28:32 +0000

I agree in the conventional contract sense where they actually know who the parties really are.

By: TotalAttorneys

TotalAttorneys — Fri, 30 Jan 2009 22:11:59 +0000

While it's true that Digg would have to prove individual user agreements had been breached to its detriment (and that the breach had been intentionally induced by USocial), it would not require the testimony of the breaching party to establish such a case. If it did, it would be virtually impossible to prove up a tortious interference case because any such claim would require an admission of wrongdoing from the party who had breached the contract. The wonderful world of electronic discovery would make this a much easier case to prove than your analysis indicates. TotalAttorneys's Recent post...New Mortgage Loans Declining, but Fraud Still on the Rise